EVALUATION OF NEW HEARING AID
TECHNOLOGY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
FRYE ELECTRONICS
Wayne Staab, Consultant Frye Electronics
University of Texas at Dallas PhD students
Paul Dybala
Gary Overson
Jack Scott
MURPHY’S LAW
OVERVIEW
Part 2
VERIFICATION ISSUES
PROCEDURES FOR TESTING AIDS WITH:
1) DIGITAL AIDS
2) MULTIPLE CHANNELS
3) ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
4) DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
5) GROUP DELAY and PHASE
6) REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
OVERVIEW
Part 3
INTERPRETING SPECIAL CURVES
SO WHAT?
HEARING AID
FEATURES
BEFORE WE BEGIN WITH EVALUATION OF THESE OPTIONS, LET’S LOOK AT
….SOME STANDARD VERIFICATION TOOLS….
ANSI S3.22-1996 (revision of ANSI ’87)
Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics
ANSI S3.42-1992
Testing Hearing Aids with a Broad-Band Noise Signal
Latest Option:
ANSI S3.22 2003!!!
Won’t see it on Test Boxes until about 2005!
Couplers
Hearing Aid Settings
Adjust controls to the settings stated by the manufacturer or in ANSI if you want to compare to SPECS!
If doing a quick check, can run at user settings. Be sure to make note of settings for future reference.
ANSI S3.22-1996 (revision of ANSI ’87)
Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics
1) OSPL90
OSPL90 (Old Term: SSPL90)
Output (Saturation) Sound Pressure Level
Present a 90 dB input level to the HA mic
VC = Full-on
Measure over frequency range
1) OSPL90
USEFULNESS?
Allows one to see the maximum output the HA can generate
Gives quick estimate of aid’s power (High gain: peak at 130 dB SPL Plus!, Low gain: peak at 120 dB or less!
Can relate to HA matrix (1st number), i.e., 114/40/15
Compare to directly to UCL when measured with insert earphone and expressed in dB SPL
2) HFA OSPL90-High Frequency Average Output Saturation Sound Pressure Level
3) FOG-Full On Gain
Full-on Gain
60 dB SPL input to HA mic for non AGC aids
50 dB SPL input to HA mic for AGC aids
and high power aids
VC = Full-on
3) FOG-Full On Gain
Usefulness?
Allows an estimate of the power of the aid (HIGH: FOG is 50 to 75 dB; MILD gain is 20 to 40 dB
Middle number of HA matrix (114/40/15)
(Last number of the matrix is the rise in the curve in dB between 500 Hz and the first peak on the graph)
4) HFA FOG- High Frequency Average Full-On Gain Curve
5) SPA FOG-Special Purpose Average
Special Purpose Hearing Instrument Average (SPA)
Used for very high frequency response hearing aids having essentially no gain at 1000 or 1600 Hz
Manufacturer determines the 3 frequencies to use for these to calculate a SP Average
6) RTG-Reference Test Gain
RTGP-Reference Test Gain Position
Reduced VC setting to simulate how aid performs at a level closer to typical speech
Conversational speech of 65 dB SPL has ± 12 dB variation so max level would = 77 dB;
HFA OSPL90 – 17 dB = Target level to adjust VC to achieve with a 60 dB SPL input
RTG-Explanation
We want to turn down volume to a "use" setting….
So that could be the setting that allows the typical input level (65) plus variation (+12) to not exceed OSPL90;
So if we want to find that level…then work backwards…Take OSPL90 minus 65 minus 12
BUT
We use 60 dB input….so we subtract 17 dB from HFA OSPL90 and adjust VC to get that output with average input at 1, 1.6, and 2.5 kHz at 60 dB SPL
7) Frequency Response
Reference Test Gain=HFA OSPL90-17-60 or
=HFA OSPL90-77
Frequency Response Curve-Set VC to RTG
Input = 60 dB SPL
Input = 50 dB Low gain aids and AGC aids
Frequency Range
Determined from Frequency Response Curve
Average of 1000, 1600, and 2500 Hz, and subtract 20 dB.
Draw horizontal line. Where horizontal line crosses response curve at left is F1 (lowest frequency) and on right is F2 (highest frequency)
Frequency Range Calculation
8) Equivalent Input noise
The noise made by the circuit of the hearing aid!
The way it is reported is misleading….
The number represents the equivalent amount of noise to deliver to the HA mic to result in the noise output that equals the circuit noise
EIN=Level in coupler with no input… minus HFA output… minus 60 dB input or
EIN=Level in coupler with no input minus RTG
SO…..
a) Present 60 dB SPL, determine average coupler SPL’s at 1000, 1600, and 2500 Hz, subtract 60 (ie RTG)
b) Remove the 60 dB SPL input and measure noise in the coupler
c) EIN= b-a
9) Harmonic Distortion
Occurs when new frequencies are generated that are harmonics of the original signal
VC in RTG position
Input = 70 dB SPL and measure total harmonic distortion at 500 and 800 Hz
Input = 65 dB SPL and measure total harmonic distortion at 1600 Hz
10) AGC Measurement
Static AGC Characteristics
Input-Output Curve
Input = measure SPL in coupler from 55 to 90 dB SPL in 5 dB steps
Dynamic AGC Characteristics
Release Time = time where level has stabilized to within 4 dB of steady state value for 55 dB signal
ANSI ‘96 Results
Time Constants (AGC Hearing Aids)
11) T-Coil Measures
Measured with a "wand" to simulate orientation to the phone
Measured across frequencies rather than at just 1 kHz
New terms:
SPLITS
HFA SPLITS
TMFS
SPLITS
SPLITS is an abbreviation for SPL in an inductive telephone simulator.
A coupler curve is run with the hearing aid in telecoil mode with the gain control at the reference-test position.
The input is a magnetic field generated by a Telephone Magnetic Field Simulator (TMFS).
HIGH-FREQUENCY AVERAGE SPLITS (HFA-SPLITS)—
The HFA-SPLITS value is the average of the dB levels at 1000, 1600, and 2500 Hz
taken
from a SPLITS curve with the hearing-aid gain control at the reference-test
position.
TELEPHONE MAGNETIC-FIELD SIMULATOR (TMFS)
It is a device used to produce a magnetic field that is consistent in both level and geometric shape.
According to the standard, the current shall be equal to 6 milliamperes divided by the number of coil turns.
SUMMARY OF TOLERANCES
TEST TOLERANCE
OSPL90 Max Specified value + 3 dB
OSPL90 (HFA or SPA) Specified value ± 4 dB
Full-on gain (HFA or SPA) Specified value ± 5 dB
Reference-test gain None (information purposes only)
Reference-test position Gain control must be within ± 1 dB of the
target setting, such that the HFA
(or SPA) output for a 60 dB-SPL: input is 17 dB below the OSPL90 HFA (or SPA),
unless the full-on gain is already
lower
Frequency response curve Low band: specified curve ± 4 dB;
high band:specified curve ± 6 dB; curve may be shifted 10% left or right, and
unlimited up or down
SUMMARY OF TOLERANCES
TEST TOLERANCE
Frequency range None (info purposes only)
Percent total harmonic distortion Max is specified value + 3%
Equivalent input noise (EIN) level Max is highest specified value
+ 3 dB
Battery current drain Max is highest specified value + 20%
Input-output (I/O) characteristic After normalizing at 70dBSPL
input point, outputs for 50- and 90-dB-SPL inputs must be
within ± 5 dB or specified values.
Attack and release times Specified value ± 5 ms or ± 50%, whichever is larger
HFA- or SPA-SPLITS Within ± 6 dB of specified value
Simulated Telephone Sensitivity None (for info purposes only)
So ANSI S3.42…
are you comfortable with it?
Never be afraid to try something new.
Remember,
….Amateurs built the ark.
..... Professionals built the Titanic!
ANSI S3.42-1992
Testing Hearing Aids with a Broad-Band Noise Signal
Designed to test non-linear Hearing Aids with Broadband signals
Gives Family of 4 Response Curves
Inputs range from 40 to 90 dB SPL
ANSI S3.42-1992
Testing Hearing Aids with a Broad-Band Noise Signal
Reference:
Complex and Pure-tone Signals in the Evaluation of Hearing Aid Characteristics
Stemachowicz, P., Lewis, D., Seewald, R., and Hawkins, D.
JSHR 33, 380-385
ANSI S3.42-1992
Definitions
NSPL90
The root mean square (RMS) output sound pressure level (SPL) produced by a hearing aid with its gain set at maximum and with a 90 dB RMS speech-weighted noise input.
Standard measurement bandwidth is limited to 200 to 5000 Hz…
Full On Noise Gain
With the gain control on the hearing aid in the full-on position, the noise gain is a single figure expressed in dB and is derived by subtracting the overall RMS input SPL to the hearing from the RMS output SPL produced by the hearing aid
E.g., with a 50 dB RMS noise input, noise gain = output SPL – 50 dB
Root Mean Square
RMS = x12 + x22 + x32 +… xn
2n
RMS Calculation
ANSI ‘92 Results
ANSI ‘92 Results
Hearing Aid Settings
Adjust controls to the settings stated by the manufacturer
ANSI S3.42-1992
Testing Hearing Aids with a Broad-Band Noise Signal
Last Minute Advice to get this all done….
If you have a lot of tension and you get a
headache, do what it says on the
aspirin bottle:
"Take two aspirin"
and
EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY
1) DIGITAL AIDS
2) MULTIPLE CHANNELS
3) ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
4) DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
5) GROUP DELAY AND PHASE
6) REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
1) EVALUATING DIGITAL AIDS
REVIEW OF : Digital vs. Analog
"Digital" sound…
Sound is "quantized" or described in very minute detail using a numeric code of 1’s and 0’s
This number code uses digits, hence the term DIGITal
"Analog"
The word "analogy" and "analogous" have same root
"Similar or alike enough to be compared"
Persons voice on the phone ANALAGOUS to their real voice…
Electroacoustic Tests with
Digital Aids
Testing noise reduction:
If tested with traditional complex steady-state signal, the aid interprets this as noise and reduces the gain
But when tested with interrupted signal, gain is not reduced
Important to test this function
EVALUATION OF NOISE REDUCTION CIRCUIT
BY USING THE DIGITAL SPEECH IN NOISE TEST (Star Option) CAN SEE THE EFFECTS OF SPECIAL NOISE REDUCTION CIRCUITS
also compare results to tests with
NOISE REDUCTION OFF……
Some Aids have
Test/Verification Mode
Phonak – Claro
Siemens – Signia, Prisma
Resound – 5000 Series
Sonic Innovation - Natura
Examples of DSP Hearing Aids Where a Modulated Signal May or May Not Be Required to Obtain Accurate REAG/REIG Measures.
Sonic Innovations: No
ReSound 5000/Canta: No
Widex Senso/Diva: Yes
Phonak Claro: Yes
Entering DSIN
The DSIN Screen
Two Speech Spectra
ANSI and ICRA Spectrum
(Frye, 2000)
Same Hearing Aid Measured With Three Signals
(Frye, 2000)
Adding a Bias Tone
ANSI Testing with a Bias Tone
No Bias and 500 Hz Bias Added in Between the Bursts of the Digital Speech (Frye, 2000)
No Bias and 4000 Hz Bias Added in
Between the Bursts of the Digital Speech
(Frye, 2000)
Some Aids have
Test/Verification Mode
Phonak – Claro
Siemens – Signia, Prisma
Resound – 5000 Series
Sonic Innovation - Natura
Phonak - Claro
GN Resound
Siemens Prisma
Siemens - Signia
Sonic Innovation
EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY
1) DIGITAL AIDS
2) MULTIPLE CHANNELS
3) ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
4) DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
5) GROUP DELAY and PHASE
6) REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
2) EVALUATION OF MULTIPLE CHANNELS
Many programmable aids have more than a single channel
Automatic signal processing may result in different responses in different channels
With ANSI S3.42 ’92 can see the gain effects across the channels
With "Enhanced Attack and Release" can see the temporal effects across channels
CHECK FREQUENCY RESPONSE
ANSI S3.42 ’92 – to see differential changes in frequency response across channels
CHECK ATTACK/RELEASE TIMES
CHECK
INPUT/OUTPUT CURVES
I/O CURVES
A choice of test frequencies to measure I/O curves in frequency regions where different compression thresholds and compression ratios have been set
Inquiring
Beavers
want to know!!!
Beavers want to know…..
What happens in different channels?
What does the noise reduction do?
How much difference does the directional microphone make?
EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY
1) DIGITAL AIDS
2) MULTIPLE CHANNELS
3) ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
4) DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
5) GROUP DELAY and PHASE
6) REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
3) ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
Some circuits designed with release times that vary with the duration of the input signal.
This is intended to activate short RTs for sounds such as door slams but longer RTs for continuous noise to prevent it from being amplified during pauses in speech
ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
The Adaptive Attack &Release Test performs a 2000-Hz attack test,followed by a special,two-signal release test consisting of a
short signal (1/10 second)and
long signal (2 seconds)
You can select whether the signal level varies between 55 and:75,80,85,90,or 95dB SPL
(80 is standard).
ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY
1) DIGITAL AIDS
2) MULTIPLE CHANNELS
3) ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
4) DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
5) GROUP DELAY and PHASE
6) REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
4)DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
It is possible that by just using conventional verification techniques (real ear measures) that malfunctioning directional mics could be missed
Helpful to demonstrate to the patient the benefit of directional mics
MICROPHONE TYPES
Omni-directional
Directional
Dual Microphone
Dynamic microphone designs
Multiple mic arrays
endfire (along side of head)
broadside (across the front)
MEASURE FRONT TO BACK RATIO
Measure real ear performance
with speaker in the front and in the back of the patient
to verify the rear mic is actually working to reduce sounds from the rear
FRONT TO BACK RATIO MEASURES
1) dB SPL plots
loudspeaker in front
loudspeaker in rear
2) Gain plots
loudspeaker in front as "REUR"
loudspeaker in rear as "REAR"
"REIG" is NOW the…..
"Front-to-Back Ratio"
3) Can also measure in the test box by rotating the aid in the box with the lid open
How are we doing???
CLUELESS???
EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY
1) DIGITAL AIDS
2) MULTIPLE CHANNELS
3) ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
4) DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
5) GROUP DELAY AND PHASE
6) REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
Enhanced DSP Option
Designed to measure the "group delay" of a DSP aid. In other words, the actual digital processing time of a hearing aid.
0 ms for analog aids
1-6 ms (or greater) for DSP
Easy way to "see" of aid is analog or DSP
Also tests the "phase" of a hearing aid. This is useful for binaural fittings. Are the aids working together?
Technical Details
Group Delay
Technical Details
Phase measurement
Entering Enhanced DSP
Enhanced DSP Test #1
Phase comparison
Enhanced DSP Test #2
Enhanced DSP Test #3
Enhanced DSP Test #4
Phase comparison
Enhanced DSP #5
Phase Comparison
Enhanced DSP #6
Comparison of Phase
New Phase Differences Discovered
EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY
1) NOISE REDUCTION
2) MULTIPLE CHANNELS
3) ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
4) DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
5) GROUP DELAY AND PHASE
6) REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
6) REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
The size of the residual ear canal volume is much smaller with CIC than with other aids….
BTE, ITE, and CIC’s tested with 2cc coupler
CIC tested with new coupler- .4cc
REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
Not intended to replicate an ANSI run
Two options:
Manual Mode
Automatic Mode
Attach aid to CIC coupler in the same manner as ITE is attached to HA1
REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
Compare differences re: HA2 and CIC coupler
First test with HA2
Next test with CIC
The greater output with CIC coupler is more realistic of what patients receive
REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
In Manual Mode………
Test as desired…
Multi-Curve,GAIN,
Digital Speech-in-Noise, Profiler, and AVG options
In Automatic Mode…..
Same tests as in ANSI ’87
Can choose options in CIC Setup menu
REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
AUTO CIC SETUP
AID TYPE LINEAR; AGC WITH EIN; AGC WITHOUT
EIN; ADAPTIVE WITH EIN; ADAPTIVE AGC
WITHOUT EIN
FULL ON GAIN 60 dB; 50 dB
TELECOIL DISABLED; ENABLED
AVERAGE FREQUENCIES 1000 1600 & 2500 Hz HFA;
1250 2000 & 3150 Hz (SPA);
1600 2500 & 4000 Hz (SPA);
2000 3150 & 5000 Hz (SPA);
800 1250 & 2000 Hz (SPA)
DELAY MENU
REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
SUMMARY
VERIFICATION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY EXTREMELY IMPORTANT….
SUPPORT THE NEED FOR ADVANCED FEATURES
VERIFY FOR THIRD PARTY PAYMENT
DEMONSTRATION TO PATIENTS
OPTIMIZE FITTING PROCESS
SUMMARY
1) NOISE REDUCTION
2) MULTIPLE CHANNELS
3) ADAPTIVE RELEASE TIME
4) DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
5) GROUP DELAY and PHASE
6) REDUCED RESIDUAL CANAL VOLUME (CICs)
SUMMARY
DON’T BELIEVE THE MYTH THAT DIGITAL HEARING AIDS CANNOT BE TESTED…..
ONLY TRUE IF STUCK IN MODE OF PUSHING BUTTON FOR ANSI AUTOMATED RUNS
BREAK AWAY FROM TRADITIONAL AUTOMATED RUNS
EXAMINE YOUR INSTRUMENTS!!!
Our Core Questions:
How well do the simulated 2-cc coupler response curves agree with measured
curves?
How well do the attack / release-time data provided agree with these time constants as measured re: ANSI S3.22-1996?
3 levels on screen "Simulated 2cc Output"
Procedure
BTEs were left connected to Hi Pro box throughout programming & measurement
BTEs were programmed for 4 different hearing losses
Simulated frequency responses
Data Analysis
Simple difference score:
Simulated minus 2cc-coupler
RMS difference score:
RMS = x12 + x22 + x32 +… xn
2n
Simulated – 2cc-coupler Response
Another Example: (Simulated – 2cc)
Results
Average differences, all BTEs
…So, what you SEE is what you GET?
The average difference data are just that…averages
The range of difference scores is important
Following are a few examples…
Average for the Loss
The aid with the smallest difference scores
The aid with the largest difference scores
Loss A
Loss B
Loss C
Loss D
RMS Calculation
…from previous slide: 6,7,3,3,3,3
Square values & sum: 36+49+9+9+9+9=121
Get mean value: 121¸ 6 = 20.167
Take the square root: Ö 20.167 = 4.5
Another Example: (Simulated – 2cc)
RMS calculation (Sim. – 2cc Coupler)
RMS = Ö [(1+25+4+1+16+4)¸ 6]=2.9
Measures of Attack and Release Time
Some preliminary data
BTE #5: the manufacturer’s software provided attack and release time measures in the low and high channels
Summary and Conclusions
On
average, across a wide range of input levels, hearing aids, and hearing losses, simulated estimates of 2cc-coupler responses are within ± 2 dB of measured valuesSignificant departures (>
± 5 dB) from the predicted 2cc-coupler values occurred 27.5% of the time(192 / 696 measures)
Summary and Conclusions, continued
Differences between digital vs. analog? …not significant
These findings reaffirm the utility of obtaining 2cc-coupler measures prior to fitting the hearing aids
Summary and Conclusions, continued
Release times as measured using ANSI S3.22-1996 varied from those shown by
the software
Here, our n=1…
Comparative research is continuing
Recommendations…
Thank you for your Attention!
SIARC
Summer Intensive Aural Rehabilitation Conference
Weeklong Intensive Program for communication partners to learn communication
strategies, coping skills, and use of ALDs in the real world!
July, 2004
In Summary…….
Input vs. Output Compression
5) INTERNAL or BOOT
FM RECEIVERS
BEHIND THE EAR FM RECEIVERS
Telex Select 1-40
Phonic Ear Free Ear
BOOT FM RECEIVERS
Phonak MicroLINK
Testing with Direct Audio Input
Testing with Neckloop
Testing Environmental Microphone
DEMO- MEASUREMENTS WITH FM SYSTEMS
REAL EAR MEASUREMENTS WITH FM SYSTEMS
REAL EAR MEASUREMENTS WITH FM SYSTEMS
REAL EAR MEASUREMENTS WITH FM SYSTEMS
Electroacoustic Tests with
Digital Aids
Also need to test channel functions
Frye 6500 test box allows for a "bias" tone
The "bias" tone is interpreted as noise in just that frequency region and a filter in that region is initiated