We've seen videos of lava boiling the oceans off Hawaii. What weight
of liquid iron, Fe, at its melting point (1538°C) will bring a liter of
25°C water to its boiling point?
Species
Average CP J/mol K
Enthalpy of Fusion kJ/mol
Enthalpy of Vaporization kJ/mol
Fe(s)
37.6
13.81
-
H2O(l)
75.4
6.01
50.65
CP is assumed averaged over the relevant
temperature range. A liter of water weighs 1 kg.
Since we can neither create nor destroy energy, the energy gained by the water
in warming from 25°C to 100°C must have been lost by the iron in
condensing at 1538°C then cooling to 100°C. So we
need only set up that equivalence and solve for the only unknown, moles of Fe.
nH2O CP, H2O
TH2O = nFe [
Hfus, Fe + CP, Fe
TFe]
nFe = nH2O CP, H2O
TH2O / [
Hfus, Fe + CP, Fe
TFe]
which ought to surprise you. As hot as liquid iron is, the quenching power
of water with its high heat capacity (twice that of iron on a molar basis...
and over 6× higher on a weight basis!) is impressive.
But then blacksmiths have known this since the Bronze Age.
By what factor can an ideal diatomic gas expand reversibly and adiabatically
starting at 25°C before it reaches the freezing point of water?
(Assume that neither vibrations nor electronic states play
any role in the heat capacities. A good assumption.)
This can tell you something about condensation of water in rising air
currents in our summer thunderstorms. Air, after all, is an ideal diatomic
gas; two even! And its expansion in updrafts is nearly adiabatic. In fact,
the change in T with altitude is called the "adiabatic lapse rate."
The expression we need to relate volume and temperature in a reversible,
adiabatic expansion (or compression for that matter) is given below in
part (b), viz.,
T VR/CV = c
T1 V1R/CV = T2 V2R/CV
(V2/V1)R/CV = T1/T2
V2/V1 = (T1/T2)CV/R
Now for a diatomic molecule with no vibration or electronic states of thermal
consequence, CV = CVTRANS+CVROT
= 3(½R)+2(½)R = (5/2)R, so CV/R = 2.5.
V2/V1 = (T1/T2)2.5 = (298/273)2.5 = 1.25
I warned you in class that the constants we tossed about in the
expressions for reversible, adiabatic expansions weren't the same. Show that by
determining c" in terms of c, where
T VR/CV = c
P VCP/CV = c"
(Remember, we're talking about a mole of ideal gas here,
but it doesn't have to be diatomic.)
Since it's a mole of ideal gas, we can eliminate T from the first equation
using T=PV/R to give
(PV/R) VR/CV = [P V(1 + R/CV)] / R = [P V(CV+R)/CV] / R = [P VCP/CV] / R = c