Rhetoric 1302 – section 025 and section 028

Fall 2003

 

INSTRUCTOR: Chad J. Pearson

University of Texas at Dallas

School of Arts & Humanities

 

DAYS/TIME [TR/12:30 – 1:45 p.m.]

[TR/ 2-3:15]

 

LOCATION [JO 4.122]

 

Office: JO 4.118

 

Office Hours: Tues./Thurs. 3:20 – 4:20 p.m., and by select appointment

 

Phone: 972-883-2018

 

Email:  cj_pearson@sbcglobal.net

 

UTD Rhetoric Website: http://lingua.utdallas.edu/rhetoric

Contains links to course syllabus, reference and research resources, LRO, and LinguaMoo

 

Learning Record Online (LRO): http://lro.cwrl.utexas.edu

 

Course Description

 

This course focuses on critical thinking by using an integrated approach to writing that teaches various rhetorical strategies for reading and constructing arguments, both written and visual. You will learn to read texts critically according to key components in argumentative discourse (i.e., claims, grounds, explicit and implicit assumptions, fallacies, etc.) and to recognize the different purposes of argument (i.e., to inquire, to convince, to persuade, to negotiate). You will write and revise three to four papers based on issues and controversies raised in the various texts read during the semester. The assignments will give you extensive practice in reading critically and writing according to the rhetorical conventions of an argumentative essay.

 

Learning Record Online

 

Student work will be collected in an electronic portfolio called the “Learning Record Online” (LRO) throughout the semester. Use of online technology will enhance the level of feedback you receive, as well as give you experience in the kinds of collaborative work that many organizations use routinely. Online interaction and argumentative writing will comprise a large part of the evaluation in the course. Other assignments will include interviews, observations, and notes, all of which will be entered into your LRO. The LRO portfolio is your most important argument in the course as it shows the sum evidence of your learning, including your own observations and analysis of your learning. You will belong to a “work group” for various collaborative activities (i.e., discussion of readings, peer critiques), and you will participate in mid-term and semester-end moderation readings of your LRO portfolio for feedback from your peers. Because learning to read critically and write responsively entails mastery of a process, your work will undergo extensive revisions in response to peer readings and collaboration as well as conferencing with your instructor.

 

Required Texts & Supplies

 

The Aims of Argument: A Rhetoric and Reader by Timothy Crusius and Carolyn Channell, fourth edition (not the “brief” edition), 2002.

Brief Penguin Handbook by Lester Faigley, brief edition, 2002.

 

Also bring CD-write able disks if you want to save your work to disk during class. Since you cannot save multiple times on a CD-R disk, bring several if you have many files. Also, for those that still will be using floppy disks, floppy disk drives will be provided on an as needed basis and will attach to the USB-port on the I-Mac. The Rhetoric classroom uses I-Mac computers that can read disks with either PC or Mac formatting. Most documents will be produced in Microsoft Word. Whether you use MS Word outside of the classroom or not, it is best to save your files as rich text format (RTF) to insure compatibility between the word processing program you use and the one in your classroom.

 

Attendance Policy

 

Because participation is vital to successful completion of Rhetoric 1302, you should attend every class. If you must be absent, check with your classmates or with me for any work you missed that can be made up. Much of the work is done collaboratively in class. Alternative assignments are generally not given, nor can the instructor “re-teach” missed classes for individual students. If you miss more than three classes, your grade will be negatively affected and/or you may be encouraged to drop the class. Two tardies will count as one absence. Chronic tardiness is unacceptable, as are coming to class unprepared, doing work that is not for this course during class, sleeping in class, or using the computers or other personal electronic devices for personal messaging, research, or entertainment. Please turn off cellular/mobile phones, pagers, and other personal electronic devices during class.

 

Office Hours

 

Please note my regular office hours above. You also can arrange to see me at other times that are mutually convenient. Office hours belong to you just as much as our class time. Don’t hesitate to take advantage of my availability and the help I am ready to offer. If you need to contact me outside of class time or office hours, it is best to communicate with me by email:  (cj_pearson@sbcglobal.net) rather than the office phone.

 

Grading Policy

 

This class offers you an approach to learning that may be different from your past experiences. Because the course is concerned with your development as a critical reader and writer, the grading strategy will track and monitor that development. Your work will be collected in an electronic portfolio called the Learning Record Online (LRO). Your assignments will not receive individual grades, but will receive individual attention from me and your classmates. Your mid-term and final grades will be based on your portfolio of written observations and your work samples, including collaborative work and your three major essays, as well as completion of each component of your LRO. In the final step to completing your LRO, you will argue for your grade by summarizing your learning and estimating the grade that the evidence of your learning supports. In other words, you will directly apply what you learn in this course, argumentative writing, by arguing for your own grade. However, each component of the LRO is vital to a quality body of work: your attendance, participation, promptness, level of writing, effective arguments, creativity, collaboration, sound rhetorical skills, competent use of technology—all of these things and more contribute to an outstanding portfolio.

 

Your goal is to demonstrate your development toward mastery of five course strands (rhetoric, research, technology, collaboration, and critical thinking) and development across five dimensions of learning (confidence and independence, skills and strategies, knowledge and understanding, use of prior and emerging experience, and reflectiveness). These goals will be discussed throughout the course. Keep in mind that although we do give + and – grades at UTD, the general criteria for grading your Learning Record is still based on the A-F scale.

 

The following grade criteria describe very general indicators that both you and your instructor may take into consideration when assessing your work and progress in the course. Your estimation of your midterm and final grades should be more detailed and specific and may include a + or – if your work tilts above or below the central grade for which you argue. But the final interpretation and assessment of your grade remains the responsibility of your teacher. Note: Excessive absences will not be tolerated.

 

A         Represents outstanding participation in all course activities (including attendance and promptness); all assigned work completed on time, with very high quality in all work produced for the course. Evidence of significant and sustained development across the five dimensions of learning and five course strands.

 

B         Represents excellent participation in all course activities (including attendance and promptness); all assigned work completed on time, with consistently high quality in course work. Evidence of marked and above average development across the five dimensions of learning and five course strands.

 

C         Represents good (but average) participation in all course activities; all assigned work completed, with generally good quality overall in course work. Evidence of some development across the five dimensions of learning and five course strands.

 

D         Represents uneven participation in course activities; some gaps in assigned work completed, with inconsistent quality in course work. Evidence of development across the five dimensions of learning and five course strands is partial or unclear.

 

F          Represents minimal participation in course activities; serious gaps in assigned work completed, or very low quality in course work. Evidence of development is not available.

 

Plagiarism Policy

 

Plagiarism is the representation of another person’s work as your own, whether you mean to or not. For example, copying or paraphrasing passages from another writer’s work without acknowledging that you’ve done so is plagiarism. Allowing another writer to write any part of your essay is plagiarism. Copying or purchasing a paper from any source is plagiarism.

 

Plagiarism is a serious offense. The possible consequences range from failing the assignment to failing the course, or worse. Each incident of plagiarism at UTD must be reported to the administration. If you are not sure how to properly cite a quoted or paraphrased source, or if you need help with the format of a citation, check with the Brief Penguin Handbook, the Aims book, and/or with your teacher. Although you can (and, in fact, should) seek help and advice from friends, classmates, tutors, and others, be sure that your written work is your own.

 

See the Undergraduate Catalog for information about the consequences of Scholastic Dishonesty, or view the policy here (which is also a link on the Rhetoric Program website):

 

http://www.utdallas.edu/student/slife/dishonesty.html.

 

Major Assignments

 

First Essay: An essay to convince or persuade on the topic of race or class. Using the assigned readings in Aims and your own research, make an argument using multiple reasons supported by evidence to convince your audience to accept your argument or to persuade your audience to perform a specific action based on the principles of your argument.

First draft due: September 23

Final draft due: September 30

 

Second Essay: An integrated textual and visual essay that examines and analyzes the argument of a visual image in terms of its rhetorical elements: composition, presentation, intended audience, and effect. This essay will be created and archived in Lingua MOO. Your image may come from the visuals in Aims, other publications, Internet, or other media.

First draft due: October 16

Final draft due: October 23

 

Third Essay: An essay to resolve a conflict by addressing the needs of opposing sides. Using readings from Chapter 10 “Casebook on 9/11” in Aims and your own research, make an argument that mediates and offers a possibility for consensus that can move the opposing views to new ground.

Brief for essay due: November 4

First draft due: November 11

Second draft due: November 18

Final draft due: November 25

 

Learning Record Online: This is an online resource for managing and documenting the work and learning you do in this class. Various assignments will be due throughout the semester, and all observations, drafts, and essays must be included in the LRO on the date due. You will be expected to enter at least three observations a week, of which two we will start in class as the in-class writing assignment.

Parts A.1 and A.2 are due: September 4

Parts B.1 and C.1 are due: October 14

Parts B.2 and C.2 are due: November 25

 

Remember: all drafts and final drafts must be recorded online in your LRO and turned in to me in hard copy (using MLA format and citation and including a Works Cited page) on the dates they are due.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Syllabus Itinerary (subject to change)

 

[Assignments are due by the next class period unless noted otherwise]

 

Thu 8/21: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Intro to course and Rhetoric program website; informal discussion of rhetoric techniques; intro to computers; write down e-mail addresses

Assignments: Read Aims Chs 1-2


 

Tue 8/26: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Intro to LRO; Discussion of Aims Chs 1-2; writing exercise

Assignments: Remember to meet in library lobby next class period; Record an observation in your LRO; Read Ch 3 in Aims; familiarize yourself with Brief Penguin Handbook; Complete LRO parts A.1 and A.2 by 9/4

 

Thu 8/28: In-class: Library Tour

Assignments: Review Ch. 3 on Toulmin Method; Brainstorm ideas on race and class issues for first paper; Start entering in writing prompts done in class as observations and write more observations; Practice browsing electronic journals and assessing validity of Internet sites for research


 

Tue 9/2: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Discussion of Ch 3 on Toulmin method and Brief Penguin Handbook and its resources; Small Groups Toulmin analysis of Amber Young’s “Capital Punishment” (p 63)

Assignments: Record an observation on this exercise in your LRO; Read Aims Ch 6 and Introduction to Ch 16, “Race and Class: Examining Social Inequality”, Bruce Robert’s photograph, and Ryszard Kapuscinski’s “Second Thoughts about America’s Racial Paradise” (Aims 840-849)

 

Thu 9/4: In-class: DUE: LRO parts A.1 and A.2; In-class writing and selected read back; Discussion of Aims Ch 6, Robert’s photograph, and Kapuscinski essay; open up discussion about other current racial issues

Assignments: Record an observation in your LRO; Read Michael Lind’s “The Beige and the Black” and Abigail and Stephan Thernstrom’s “Black Progress: How Far We’ve Come-And How Far We Have to Go” (Aims 850-62)


 

Tue 9/9: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; General class and Small Groups discussions of Questions for Discussion following Lind and Thernstrom essays; open up discussion about other issues related to race

Assignments: Record an observation in your LRO; Read Ramey photograph, Darling-Hammond’s “Unequal Opportunity: Race and Education,” and Shelby Steele’s “The Recoloring of Campus Life” (Aims 863-883); bring in a photo or drawing with a racial connotation

 

Thu 9/11: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Discussion of Ramey photograph, Darling-Hammond, and Steele essays; discussion of students’ photographs

Assignments: Record an observation in your LRO; Read Aims Ch 7 on Arguing to Convince; read Patricia Williams’s essay, “The Distribution of Distress,” (in Aims 884-892)


 

Tue 9/16: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Discussion of Aims Ch 7; Discussion of Williams’s essay; Discussion of specific forms of appeal, constructing your audience, and creating briefs; in-class brainstorming session and writing exercise

Assignments: Read Aims Ch 8 on Arguing to Persuade, especially a close reading of Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”; Record an observation in your LRO; Decide on your essay topic and create a working rhetorical prospectus in your Work Sample section (see Aims p 21) and paste into your LRO as work sample by 9/18; Create a brief for your essay to convince/persuade (see Aims p 220-242); enter it as a Work Sample, and bring it to class on 9/18

 

Thu 9/18: In-class:  In-class writing and selected read back; Discussion of Ch 8 and King’s “Letter”; paired discussions of briefs and teacher feedback; class discussion of grammar, format, and mechanics (bring Brief Penguin Handbook)

Assignments: Record Observations in your LRO; Read Aims Ch 5 on Writing Research-based Arguments; Read Brief Penguin Handbook on MLA format and how to cite and create a works cited page; Write first draft of essay #1 and enter in LRO, and bring hard copy to class on 9/23


 

Tue 9/23: In-class: First draft of essay #1 due today in LRO. Peer reviews; in-class writing and selected read back

Assignments: Record Observations in your LRO; Continue work on essay # 1

 

Thu 9/25: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Individual conferences and writing on essay #1 revisions

Assignments: Read Ch 4 in Aims “Reading and Writing about Visual Arguments”; Complete final draft of essay #1 due 9/30


 

Tue 9/30: In-class: Final draft of Essay #1 due; Discussion of Aims Ch 4; in-class writing exercise and selected read back

Assignments: Do Following Through #2 in Aims, p 79 and enter your notes as a work sample in LRO, plus be prepared to discuss your cartoon with the class; Record Observations in your LRO.

 

Thu 10/2: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Discuss your editorial cartoon and explain its argumentative tactics; Class discussion of photos in Aims Ch 10, 9/11 Casebook; brainstorming session for ideas; discuss copyright policies on the use of images

Assignments: Do research on image to use for Visual Rhetoric Essay #2; Decide on image for your essay #2 and bring it to class on Thu, 10/9; Record Observations in your LRO


 

Tue 10/7: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Introduction to Lingua MOO (integrated and interactive visual and textual argument)

Assignments: Set your preferences and describe your character at Lingua MOO (link to your own photo if you want); e-mail me if you do not yet have a Lingua MOO password; read student samples of LRO Parts B.1 (Analysis) and C.1 (Evaluation) in LRO to learn how to evaluate yourself for midterm; Parts B.1 and C.1 of LRO due on Thu, 3/6

 

Thu 10/9: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; MOO workshop on creating rooms and objects to support visual rhetoric analysis; Class discussion of LRO parts B.1 and C.1 and creating LRO work sample for MOO visual argument rooms; discussion of students’ visual rhetoric paper ideas

Assignments: Describe your room(s) at Lingua MOO and experiment with using your room(s) and objects to analyze your chosen image; Record Observations in your LRO; Complete parts B.1 and C.1 of LRO due Tue, 10/14


 

Tue 10/14: In-class: Parts B.1 and C.1 of LRO due today. Moderation readings; in-class writing and selected read back

Assignments: Record an Observation about moderation readings in your LRO; Complete first draft of Visual Argument MOO Essay #2 by 10/16 (if so desired, create recorders for each room, drop them in the room, and turn them on).

 

Thu 10/16: In-class: First draft of Visual argument MOO rooms due; Class tour of MOO rooms and peer critiques of rooms and also peer critiques of visual rhetoric essays; in-class writing and selected read back

Assignments: Read Aims Ch 9 “Resolving Conflict: Arguing to Negotiate and Mediate”; Record Observations in your LRO


 

Tue 10/21: In-class:  In-class writing and selected read back; Discussion of Aims Ch 9

Assignments: Complete Follow Through #1 at top of p 319 in Aims by writing a short 1-page response and enter it as a Work Sample in your LRO by 10/23; Read Part 1 of Aims Ch 10 (pp 345-361, Getting Oriented and Recalling the Attack) 

 

Thu 10/23: In-class: Final draft of Visual argument MOO rooms due (make sure LRO link to MOO rooms is complete and accurate); Discussion of Part I of Aims Ch 10; In-class discussion about 9/11; in-class writing exercise

Assignments: Finish short paper about your reactions to 9/11 and post as work sample in LRO by Tuesday, 10/28; Read Part II of Aims Ch 10 (361-422); Record Observations in your LRO


 

Tue 10/28: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Discuss Aims Part II of Ch 10 pp 361-422

Assignments: Record Observations in your LRO; Read first half of Part III of Aims Ch 10 (pp 423-448)

 

Thu 10/30: In-class: In-class writing and selected read back; Discussion of Aims Ch 10 pp 423-448; brainstorming ideas for papers and briefs

Assignments: Read last half of Aims Part III of Ch 10 (448-465); Choose topic from 9/11 Casebook (or your own personal idea) and create a working rhetorical prospectus for your mediatory essay #3 in your Work Sample section; then create a Brief as Work Sample due Tue, 11/4


 

Tue 11/4: In-class: Brief for Essay #3 due in LRO; Group discussions of briefs and possible re-conceiving of essay; brainstorming session; Discussion of Aims Ch 10 (448-465), in-class writing and selected read back

Assignments: Record Observations in your LRO; review Lingua MOO Roleplay categories; may begin working on first draft of essay #3

 

Thu 11/6: In-class: Roleplay in Lingua MOO; if time then further discussions about mediatory essay and ideas for first draft of essay #3

Assignments: Review Ch 9 on Arguing to Mediate or Negotiate; Review Ch 5 on researching arguments and evaluating sources; Work on first draft of essay #3 due Tue, 11/11 in LRO; bring hard copy to class for peer review


 

Tue 11/11: In-class: First draft of essay #3 due in LRO; peer reviews of first drafts; In-class writing and selected read back

Assignments: Continue working on essay # 3; record Observations in your LRO

 

Thu 11/13: In-class: Writing in-class on second draft of essay #3; individual student conferences; in-class writing exercise and selected read back

Assignments: Continue working on second draft; bring hard copy of second draft to class on Tue 11/18 for peer review


 

Tue 11/18: In-class: Second draft of essay #3 due in LRO; In-class writing and peer reviews; In-class writing exercise and selected read back

Assignments: In-class writing exercise and selected read back; Continue working on essay #3; record Observations in your LRO; Final draft of essay #3 due Tue 11/25; review LRO B.2 and C.2 section, due Tue 11/25 (final evaluation of your class performance)

 

Thu 11/20: In-class: Conference with instructor; student evaluations of course; In-class writing exercise and selected read back; In-class writing on essay #3 or any incomplete LRO assignments

Assignments: Complete final draft of essay #3 in LRO by Tue 11/25 and Complete LRO parts B.2 and C.2 all due Tue 11/25


 

Tue 11/25: In-class: Final draft of essay #3 due in LRO; LRO parts B.2 and C.2 due today. Moderation readings; in-class writing exercise and selected read back; in-class writing on any unfinished assignments in LRO

 

Thu 11/27:  Thanksgiving Holiday