PPT Slide
References
1Brokx, J.P.L. and Nooteboom, S.G. (1982). Intonation and the perception of simultaneous voices. Journal of Phonetics 10: 23-26.
2Bird, J. and Darwin, C.J. (1998). Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences. In A. R. Palmer, A. Rees, A.Q. Summerfield, & R. Meddis (Eds.), Psychophysical and physiological advances in hearing. London: Whurr.
3Assmann, P.F. (1999). Fundamental frequency and the intelligibility of competing voices. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 179-182.
4Darwin, C.J., & Hukin, R.W. (1999). Auditory objects of attention: the role of interaural time-differences in attention to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25:617-29.
5Kawahara, H., Masuda-Katsuse, I. and de Cheveigné, A (1999). Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds, Speech Communication, 27: 187-207.
6Kalikow, D.N., Stevens, K.N., and Elliott, L.L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61: 1337-1351.
7Scheffers, M.T. (1983). Sifting vowels: auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
8Assmann, P.F. and Summerfield, Q. (1994). The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 471-484.