From: John Jetmore Newsgroups: alt.humor.best-of-usenet Subject: [alt.fan.cecil-adams] I could care less Date: 4 Dec 1997 21:25:01 -0700 Subject: Re: I could care less (Was: Re: franco=italian or frog?) From: jlawler@tempest.rs.itd.umich.edu (John M. Lawler) Newsgroups: alt.fan.cecil-adams iayork@panix.com (Ian A. York) writes: >Seriously, I hear more people complaining about "could care less" than I >hear using it. Sure, lots of people use it; but it has to be the >most-complained-about formation in English. Why complain about c-c-l and >not about, say, "Head over heels"? Because "head over heels" is just a conventional body action metaphor, whereas "could care less" is a complicated piece of software engineering, containing a twos-complement irony inverter, a modal probability generator, and a differential emotional meter, all operating in a strong negative field generated by a controlling negative predicate. Lose the negative and you reset all the defaults and the software crashes. Unless you compile it as an idiom, which is what many younger English speakers have done. Their predecessors still have to interpret it, and thus require the negative. This troubles some English speakers (usually the ones with older software) but not others; troubled English speakers then complain to other English speakers, in a chain reaction. If the troubled speaker happens to complain to another troublable speaker, another complaint is emitted, and repeated complaints can trigger recurrences in other contexts. In environments enriched with these speakers (for instance, alt.usage.english), or when the moderator rods are withdrawn (for instance, if the word "Ebonics" or the phrase "politically correct" enters the discourse), the frequency of complaint (with concomitant mention) can grow very quickly, easily swamping actual occurrence rates. Brutus Force of the Center for Quantitative Syntax estimates that the minimum negative field required to maintain an adequate level of negativity for "could care less", and thus forestall a chain reaction, is on the order of 1100 millihorns, or 7.1 on the Nichter Scale. For more on Negative Polarity, point your browser at http://www.lsa.umich.edu/ling/jlawler/aue/npislands.html